| Having fun with TeleFUNica |
|
|
|
|
Having fun with TeleFUNica You probably know about Telefonica. A public monopoly made into a private monopoly is never a good start: the lack of competition means there's no motive for improvement. Telefonica's near monopoly is not just greedy but ludicrously inefficient, mendacious, beaurocratic and uncaring. I know the feeling. Here's my little Telefonica story. See if it is better or worse than yours. And try to spot the tactical errors in my battle strategy. November 2008 Having paid I asked for reconnection. I was told we had to pay another €10,55 but the operator couldn't explain why. I paid the money. A Telefonica engineer rang to say he would come now if we would accept a new telephone number, or next week if we wanted to keep our original number. Weird: an engineer, just to switch a line back on? Thinking of the two contracts (internet and cheap calls) on the old number, I said we'd keep it. “So, Señor, which day next week?” Ominously, he wouldn't commit. “I'll ring you,” he said. Surprise, surprise: he didn't. But I did get a bill from Telefonica saying we were €60,55 in credit! In other words we had paid our bills. So how come Telefonica cut us off for non-payment? Never mind, I thought, I'll wait till I've got the line back on I tackle that. So back to the phone, to call and ask why we still weren't reconnected. The lady I spoke to said she couldn't understand it. She told me reconnection should take only 5 days. She said she'd log a request for reconnection. Five days later, a different lady said that the previous lady had used the wrong procedure. Reconnection would take 21 days. I pointed out we had already been waiting for four weeks, that is 28 days. She said she would put “URGENTE” on the request. December 2008 One week later, a miracle! A Telefonica engineer came to our house, messed with the line and gave us…our NEW NUMBER. I said we had wanted to keep our old number: why had we been given a new one? He shrugged and said, “Pues, con Telefonica, no sé” (Well, with Telefonica, who knows?). He added that he thought our number had been given to somebody else. Judging from the many wrong numbers we got through our new number this was quite likely. Finally, the engineer gave us a new telephone, which we had never asked for: when I told him we didn't want it and wouldn't pay for it, he insisted that it was free. January 2008 I rang Telefonica asking about the bill. I was told our original line had had an ADSL service available, and this was why we had been cut off. The reconnection fee of €30 was charged in spite Unbelievable. It's the equivalent of being sold a car with new tyres, having it stolen by the seller because he forgot to charge for the tyres, then after weeks of negotiating, being sent a similar car with a bill for changing its new tyres for old ones and another bill for delivering the vehicle. Unbelievable. TACTICAL ERRORS 1.Expecting Communication. Well, they are a communications company! But it was naïve to imagine Telefonica would contact us before cutting us off. Having operated as a monopoly for decades, Telefonica isn't about to start acting as if customers have any choices. 3.Expecting Telefonica to Listen. We told them we wanted our own number, we wanted to be reconnected, we didn't want the new phone if it cost anything. What a waste of breath. 4.Believing a Telefonica Employee. They are clearly undertrained and probably underpaid. Unless they are actually lying, many have little, no or only misleading information to give. We were told we owed money when we didn't, we were told the reconnection would happen when it wouldn't, we were told the phone would be free when it wasn't. 5.Putting off the Engineer. Never, ever put a Telefonica employee off from visiting your house. Once they are there you can kidnap them and demand a huge ransom: real customer care! It would have saved us weeks! Rose Jones |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






